Historic landmark or hell of a landmark?
Published Date: November 11th, 2006
Lately we’ve been sitting around the office talking about the history of Savannah and the architectural legacy that has been left for us. Savannah is blessed to have 24 immaculate squares, buildings such as the Telfair and the Lucas Theatre, shanty shacks lining Broad Street, homes like the Hamilton-Turner and the Mercer, and post-war cinderblock boxes such as the Drayton. That’s right. The Drayton Tower. We have actually spent time on the Michael Brown / Mopper Stapin disaster currently known as Drayton Towers. Ah, the beauty that can be found in the eleven floors of George Jetson-esque structure and design. With its sweeping views and luxurious interior, the Towers are part of what makes Savannah great. Right? My gosh. Everytime I ride by that building I wonder why we haven’t seen it on one of those TLC shows that document the destruction of buildings and the demolition teams that bring them down. It is hideous. It no more speaks of the bleakness of the cold war and the people that lived that era than a piece of rubble being passed off as part of the Berlin Wall. If anything it is a stark reminded or the capitalistic notions that have shrouded our nations legacies since the cold war. Make it bigger. Make it (supposedly) better. And make money off it! It is reported that six of the floors have been sold for upwards of 2.1 million dollars. What? Are you kidding me? Right now the towers (by permit) have less than six months to be finished and they haven’t even finished demo work. Most of the windows are hanging on by a….well, go see for yourself. Take an afternoon to enjoy the architectural legacy of the hostess city!
Technorati Tags: Savannah, Telfair, Lucas Theatre, Michael Brown, Mopper Stapin, Drayton Towers, TLC


Actually, the “Victorian” movement in America reflected a more sinister reminder of European elitism and gross emphasis on class, education and privilege. In Savannah’s case, those tendencies were reflected by the mid 1800s in outrageousely ornamented and over-sized homes, most often built by extremely wealthy cotton-brokers using slave labor. It was as if the cotton elite class wanted to make up for their origins. Most of them could trace their family roots back to debtor prisons in England. Could it be that they wanted the very things their ancestors were denied?
At least Bauhaus architects rejected “bourgeois” details such as cornices, eaves and decorative details. They wanted to use principles of Classical architecture in their most pure form: without ornamentation of any kind.
The Bauhaus school disbanded when the Nazis rose to power.
We need to put the Drayton Tower in perspective. It is truely American with roots in Bauhaus. I hold that it reflects better values than the Victorian model so often admired by visitors.
For a better understanding of the true evil of American Victorianism, read Robert Persig’s “Lila”.